<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WILD ARTIST &#187; Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildartist.org/archives/tag/failure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildartist.org</link>
	<description>All about LIFE</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:00:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Development process and project failure</title>
		<link>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/469</link>
		<comments>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/469#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Allo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PROJECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildartist.org/?p=469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there any project which is good at development process but failed in whole project? Yes, of course. Actually, misleading process of development is just one of the reasons for failure. Other reasons? Overly budget, delaying, failure in advertising, environmental changes, and &#8230; <a href="http://www.wildartist.org/archives/469">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any project which is good at development process but failed in whole project? Yes, of course. Actually, misleading process of development is just one of the reasons for failure. Other reasons? Overly budget, delaying, failure in advertising, environmental changes, and so forth. We should not miss the train, should we? Let&#8217;s take an advisory.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-471" title="failure" src="http://www.wildartist.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/failure.jpg" alt="failure" width="300" height="344" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;re so many tools or methodologies to manage project. But they are not sufficient to judge whether the project goes well. Totally integrated data collection, measurement, analysis, and process would make it better. First of all, monitoring the trend of customers and interpreting it are the preceding task. (But never reveal them to the public as your data collection should keep their trust) That analysis can help estimate the project objectively trusted. Second, communication matters on the project while business is separated development or product line. (or vendor to customers) If one of them are bottle neck, then whole project would be delayed. Thus you&#8217;d rather share all the things of the project in your company so that project members can catch the narrow position. Lastly, you should avoid the following situations:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ambiguous or diffuse project ownership.</li>
<li>Stakeholder complexity</li>
<li>Conflicts of interest</li>
<li>Inconsistencies (hardest to discern in advance)</li>
</ul>
<p>Project management is not the easy one and the failed project is desperate. The best is not to start the project if it has less possibility or is in a bad condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/469/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Requirements into failed project</title>
		<link>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/318</link>
		<comments>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/318#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Allo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PROJECT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wildartist.org/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bunch of projects have died because of improper requirements. That shows ambiguous requirements create failed project. In contrast, defining the right set of requirement will improve the quality of the product. What makes such differences by requirements? Requirement is a kind &#8230; <a href="http://www.wildartist.org/archives/318">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bunch of projects have died because of improper requirements. That shows ambiguous requirements create failed project. In contrast, defining the right set of requirement will improve the quality of the product. What makes such differences by requirements?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wildartist.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/writingwithpencil.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-319" title="writingwithpencil" src="http://www.wildartist.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/writingwithpencil.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="216" /></a></p>
<p>Requirement is a kind of communication. Properly documented requirements help reduce the gap between stockholders (who mostly require). And understanding requirements from the start synchronize development group with business users and their needs. The following is the list of proper solutions.</p>
<ul>
<li>Document the requirements clearly.</li>
<li>Set priority of each requirements.</li>
<li>Record the trace of the requirements.</li>
<li>Technical team should communicate to business users.</li>
<li>If there lies any change, be clear about the implications for scope and cost.</li>
</ul>
<p>These rules are not the essential conditions to get the project succeed. But they&#8217;re some of guidelines which can avoid project getting down into failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wildartist.org/archives/318/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

