Innovation, innovation, innovation. Some may be trembling or faltering when they hear the word because it is the symbol of the stress from uncertainty. Nobody can anticipate the future accurately though it seems to be acquired with a surge of snippets. Then what innovation really means is that it transforms the structure, design, system and the other features around the nature LITTLE BY LITTLE (that is the point) as no innovation is perfect.
[ Little by little, mentos has gone ]
On the other words, the innovation itself should be evaluated regularly. I call it meta-innovation; the innovation of innovation. Surely some innovation could go to disaster. Some may not be realistic or not be profitable. There might be many exceptions which are not predictable. So the meta-innovation matters.
Meta-innovation should be shown in perspective. It’d rather see the past innovations in the view of critisicm. No compromise, no making any excuse. Such analysis would give the insight for another innovation and that could effect that much. It seems like the relation between acceleration and velocity. Velocity influences the motion of an object and acceleration pitches a little tweak toward the final object which is moving.
No wonder that there is a strategy of innovation and it is able to make something up. And the control is the main idea of meta-innovation as outpaced object is terrible sometimes. So, I suggest a cycle of innovation and meta-innovation: 3-innovations per 1-meta-innovation. Besides, the innovation should at least be conducted in every 3-month. Is it so often? My opinion about it is this: 3-month is too long to overtake the speed of change in business world. Remember, the world changes quickly than ever and there needs the acceleration on the way.
